SM & The Law
This excellent document was obtained from
the Web Page of the DC Men of Discipline. It is included for your
edification.
Introduction
As you read this, you may find it to be a
little frightening. Please remember that, in a legal sense just
as in health considerations, there is no such thing as "safe sex."
There is however, with education, "safer sex." Just as in the health
arena, education and caution can help to avoid frightening results.
So be aware of what you are doing, act responsibly, and you will
find you can avoid that which you may fear.
Please keep in mind that there are 50 states,
the District of Columbia and the United States. Federal laws generally
do not have much impact. In fact, J. Edgar Hoover once said, "I
regret to say that we of the FBI are powerless to act in cases of
oral-genital intimacy, unless it has in some way obstructed interstate
commerce."
Also, within each state there are counties
and cities. Each of these areas has their own laws. It would be
impossible to inform you of the specific laws in each of these areas.
Also, laws change quickly, so what I might write today, may be wrong
tomorrow.
So I am only able to tell you the areas of
concern and give you the law generally and, in some instances, make
specific references to illustrate certain ideas. Please use this
information as a guide. If you have a specific problem, or need,
contact me and I will try to help you as best I can.
Last, while I feel I have something to offer
the community from my experience and knowledge, this is an area
of law that has never really been developed. To be very honest,
I am learning this as I go. Being a good resource sometimes requires
me to listen or read more than to speak or write.
So, please, feel free to drop me a line with
any information that you think may be helpful. Please give as much
detail as you can such as newspaper names and dates or specific
court information. Obviously I do not want any details that should
be kept confidential, but where public information is available,
I would like it to document my files.
Send your email to: rumpoule@aol.com
SM Play Generally & Possible Criminal Charges
The area that I am asked about most often
is assault. Tops are afraid they will be charged with assault for
their actions. Bottoms have different, but related fears. Assault
is generally defined as any touching done with the intent to injure,
insult or provoke. In many places simple assaults can be made into
"aggravated" assaults depending on certain circumstances related
to the status of the victim or the use of objects or weapons.
In most places, "consent" is a defense to
assault. However, you should be aware that consent is not always
going to be available as a defense. For example, in the Spanner
case, 16 gay men in England doing SM privately were arrested and
charged with a number of crimes. Regarding assault charges, the
defense of "consent" was raised, but denied by the court on the
grounds of "public policy." Basically the court decided that the
law should not allow someone to consent to be assaulted. Most interesting
of the cases was that of John Atkinson, a bottom, who was convicted
solely of having aided and abetted others in his own assault.
Consent will also not stand as a defense
when the victim lacked the capacity to consent. So if the Bottom
is under the influence of drugs or alcohol, their ability to give
meaningful consent may be impaired.
Similarly, if consent is obtained by fraud,
it will not be available as a defense. So, for example, if a Top
misrepresents his abilities or experience, say with a single-tail
whip, he may not be able to claim consent as a defense if charged.
Other potential criminal charges include
sexual assault if sex play is involved and kidnapping and false
imprisonment if bondage is used. While these crimes are different
from assault, usually the defense will be consent. Again, consent
may be a defense as long as the jurisdiction does not prohibit it
for public policy reasons, and if the "victim" has the capacity
to give consent and does so knowledgeably.
Indecent or lewd conduct is also a crime
on the books of many states. Usually this requires exposing parts
of the body, or engaging in conduct that is considered lewd or indecent
by the public. You should be careful when engaging in "public" scenes.
If the activity is done privately, or in semi-public space where
participants have been warned and consented to being exposed to
what will be happening, there should not be any problem.
Possession of illegal weapons, objects or
substances is another area of concern. This is an area where local
laws differ a lot. Be careful of carrying a concealed weapon if
you do not have a permit to do so. Remember that some weapons may
be illegal, or cannot be carried concealed depending on their character.
A simple folding pocketknife may be legal to carry concealed in
your pocket in most places. But in some places, depending on the
blade size, it may not. Needles may be illegal to possess in some
places. And remember that it may be illegal to wear an authentic
police, fire or military uniform.
Sodomy laws still existed in 20 states as
of 1994. In 1986 in Bowers v. Hardwick, the United States Supreme
Court ruled that the constitutional right to privacy (recognized
in Griswald v. Connecticut dealing with the right to birth control
devices) does not extend to homosexual sodomy. Hardwick was a gay
Atlanta man who filed an action to have the Georgia sodomy statute
declared unconstitutional. The fact that he was not imprisoned or
charged affected the swing vote of Justice Lewis Powell. Powell
held there was no privacy right violation, but wrote that imprisonment
for such conduct might constitute cruel and unusual punishment under
the 8th Amendment. After retiring, Powell said that he probably
erred in not finding a privacy right. However, in early March, 1998
the U.S. Supreme Court ruled for the first time in Oncale v. Sundowner
Offshore, that unlawful sexual harassment in the workplace extends
to incidents involving employees of the same sex.
Ironically, in order to keep the case from
being a "gay rights" case, the court reasoned with a broader brush
saying "harassment is harassment." Thus there may be application
of the case to BDSM, D/s situations.
If the Police Arrive
Remember that although you may have negotiated
a scene with someone, the public around you was not part of those
discussions and may not understand what you are doing is consensual
and someone may call the police. Also, since the O.J. Simpson case,
the police have taken a hard line on domestic abuse situations and
frequently will make an arrest even when the "victim" says what
happened was consensual.
If the police do show up the first thing
you must remember to do is to stay calm. If you lose your calm,
or get belligerent or indignant with officers, they will not listen
to you.
You may have a choice in some things, and
not in others. If the police arrive at your home because neighbors
have heard blood-curdling screams, they have a duty, and the right,
to make sure everyone one is all right. While your activities are
safe, sane and consensual, we all want the police to be able to
enter a home in an emergency situation to rescue someone who is
the victim of a violent criminal. Again, remembering to stay calm
will help a great deal. And not just the Top! It is even more important
for the Bottom to be able to speak calmly and confidently to the
police and explain that while he or she was screaming, it was all
being done for mutual enjoyment and with consent.
If, for some reason, you do not want the
police to enter your home, you should say so in a calm voice and
in clear terms such as, "no, you may not enter," or "no, you do
not have my permission to search," or "I want you to leave now."
The police may threaten to get a warrant. But don't be intimidated
by their threat to do that. On the other hand, if the police, despite
this, tell you they are going to enter, then step aside and do not
resist. If you have been arrested, you should remain silent. You
should also remain calm and, regardless of whether the officers
are right or wrong, do not resist them. You should also remember,
and record in writing as soon as possible before your memory fades,
the name and badge numbers of the officers as well as the facts
of what happened. Record this on a piece of paper and, at the top
of the paper, write in bold letters, "FOR MY ATTORNEY."
You should consult with a lawyer as soon
as you can. Do not discuss the case with ANYONE except an attorney.
If you have not been arrested but, for some
reason, do not want to speak to the police, you do not have to.
Again, if you intend to remain silent, do so in a calm voice and
in clear terms such as "I don't want to talk to you," or "I want
to speak to a lawyer first."
On the other hand, if you have not been arrested,
and talking to the police seems like a good thing to do to explain
an innocent situation, remember one thing: tell the truth. Do not
say anything that is untruthful and do not hide anything.
Sometimes, criminals who do not believe in
safe, sane and consensual conduct victimize members of our community.
Someone may consent to bondage and flogging, but not sexual activity,
and find that themselves to be the victim of a sexual assault. If
this happens, you need to decide quickly if you are going to report
the offense to the police. It is a personal decision. But if you
want a successful prosecution of the assailant, you should do some
things to help.
Stay calm. Get medical assistance. Call the
police immediately. Do not shower, urinate, or clean up. Take pictures.
You may also wish to consult with an attorney or get other support
from friends.
BDSM Pornography
Pornography is far too large of a subject
for this forum, but a few things need to be touched on. Private
possession of sexually explicit materials is not likely to be a
problem other than in two areas.
One of these areas relates to children. It
is a crime in ALL states to furnish a minor with pornography. In
a lot of cases, predators of children would not actually show children
pornography, but would leave it out and rely on the natural inquisitiveness
of children. They would claim that they did not show these materials
to children. In response, most states have passed laws that make
it a crime to recklessly or negligently expose children to pornography.
As a result, in many states there is strict liability under these
laws.
If you have sexually explicit materials in
your home and children get their hands on them, you may be found
guilty of an extremely serious offense. This is close to what happened
in the Horton case.
ProDommes and Prostitution and Pandering
Prostitution is usually defined as "sexual
conduct for money." A number of professional dominants, male submissives
that wanted to see professional dominants, and people wishing to
start private dungeons and place spaces that require an admission
fee have consulted me.
The laws in this area vary a great deal from
state to state. For example, in most areas of California, professional
dommes are not arrested for prostitution as long as there is no
"sexual contact" with the client. However, in Arizona, prostitution
is defined to include "Sadomasochistic abuse" which is further defined
to include, "flagellation or torture by or upon a person who is
nude or clad in undergarments or in revealing or bizarre costume
or the condition of being fettered, bound or otherwise physically
restrained on the part of one so clothed."
Penalties can vary as well. Usually prostitution
is a misdemeanor. But, even still, depending on local laws, a conviction
can result in a lengthy sentence.
Prostitution laws also apply to the clients
as well. In most states, law enforcement not only set up "stings"
on prostitutes by posing as clients, but also set up stings on the
clients by posing as prostitutes.
Misdemeanor prostitution can suddenly become
a pandering or "pimping" charge if others are employed in prostitution
offenses. This is usually a felony in most states. Pandering charges
have been applied in some cases where people have opened private
"SM clubs" and charged for admittance. Probably there is no problem
where people are on their own in finding partners. But where partners
are provided by management, even if there is not an extra charge,
charges have been brought.
So, be very careful any time money is being
charged in connection with a sexually related activity. Especially
when there is a profit that goes into someone's pocket, rather than
covering expenses.
The best thing to do is contact an experienced
criminal defense attorney in your area to learn not only the laws,
but what police enforcement and prosecution policies are.
On a lighter note, in the Netherlands where
prostitution is legal, the Fire Marshall announced a regulation
that that customers could not be put in bondage that took longer
than 30 seconds to release.
Possible Civil Charges
Anything that can result in criminal charges
can also result in a civil complaint as well. A prosecutor brings
criminal charges after reviewing the police reports and evidence.
Civil charges, or lawsuits, can be brought by individual citizens,
but can only result in monetary damages and not incarceration.
The proof required in a civil suit is less
than the "proof beyond reasonable doubt" standard in a criminal
case.
In addition to the matters discussed for
criminal prosecution, civil suits may cover a number of other matters
as well. Actions for negligence, for example, may be brought for
providing faulty equipment or failing to maintain it. Or for failing
to exercise due care in building it. Thus, for example, if someone
is suspended from a 2x2 piece of wood and it breaks, the person
or entity responsible for setting up the scene equipment could be
held liable for the injuries.
Private and public play spaces and equipment
needs to be carefully inspected and maintained. The premises must
satisfy local fire codes giving consideration to the materials used
and having accessible and well-lighted exit signs.
Another matter that I wonder about is when
people or groups make representations of safety. Aside from negating
consent as discussed above, you can be held to a higher standard
if you promise someone a "safe" place to play out fantasies. You
can become a guarantor of whatever you promise, even if you were
not negligent and did anything any reasonable person could do. It
is best to tell people that you try to maintain these standards,
but that they, too, must take responsibility for the safety of their
own play.
Some people use waivers to try to protect
themselves or their groups from liability for injuries. Waivers
are generally, but not always, unenforceable because, as a matter
of public policy it is considered a bad idea to allow people to
waive liability for another person's negligence. However, while
not an absolute defense, waivers can be evidence to show that the
injured person assumed the risk of their conduct in participating
in the event or activity. Similarly waivers can be used to show
the state of mind of the person who signed the waiver and that they
were aware of various inherent risks in what they were doing. So
make sure the "waiver" spells out potential risk. Waivers with specific
risks spelled out are a good idea but do not count on them for absolute
protection.
Premises liability insurance to cover faulty
equipment, loose carpeting, and other matters is also a good idea.
Master-Slave Contracts
Master/Slave contracts are not binding.
They do serve other good purposes however
in the same way that a well drafted waiver does. That is to say,
to show the knowledge, intent, and state of mind of the parties
at the time the contract is signed. Such contracts can be used to
show what the parties agreed to and that they were aware of certain
risks. They can spell out the promises that have been made, and
not made, with regard to property just like a pre-nuptial agreement.
The parties might also want to have witnesses
who would be willing to come to court and testify about the circumstances
of the signing and/or ceremony to establish that the agreement was
entered into voluntarily, consensually, and without coercion or
force.
Bars and Liquor Control, and Alcohol/Drug Use
Generally speaking, when alcohol is being
served in public, the government is allowed to be much stricter
than in other situations. Thus there are a number of things to be
concerned about depending on your state or local laws.
Often it is unlawful for someone to expose
their nipples (if female), pubic hair, genitals, anus, or even the
cleft of the anus. Wearing a device that simulates any of the areas
which must be covered may also be prohibited. Touching or fondling,
directly or indirectly, breasts, buttocks, or genitals may be unlawful.
There may be increased liability when alcohol
or drugs are involved. This is true even in a private setting.
Divorce and Child Custody
This is a particularly difficult and frightening
area.
The first thing you must remember is that
if there is even a hint of a problem with your lifestyle as it relates
to your children, you need to contact an attorney right away.
I would like to say that sexual lifestyle
is not considered by the courts in determining issues relating to
divorce and child custody. There are some cases that even say this.
But even if you live in a progressive state whose courts have said
this, the simple fact remains that people hear cases. When these
people put on black robes they are supposed to leave their personal
prejudices behind. But sometime they don't or can't. Thus a judge
deciding a custody issue may, at the least, subconsciously be influenced
by a sexual lifestyle that he or she considers to be offensive.
The ruling may not mention lifestyle and may appear to be decided
on other reasons. But underneath, that was the reason.
So consult an attorney right away, and don't
be shy about your lifestyle when discussing the case.
NLA Legal Project, Leather Leadership Conference
and what Gays have Done
Law is not static. It changes over time.
Changes can occur relatively quickly in the politically driven institutions
such as the United States Congress and the state legislatures. But
in the courts, change comes slowly. Courts are political too, but
react more slowly to public pressure for change. They are meant
to be a moderating influence from immediate public pressure. And
laws, which should be predictable, are not when they change rapidly.
It should also be kept in mind that the law is never absolute. Even
in the area of free speech, Justice Holmes wrote that it does not
protect someone from "falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing
a panic." (Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).
As a young man in the late 60s, I saw the
legal profession as way to help bring about the changes in society
that I wanted to see. One of them was freedom from governmental
interference in people's private sexual affairs. There have been
some positive changes. And there have been some areas of great disappointment.
But change will come. In 1872 in Bradwell v. State of Illinois,
an Illinois woman was denied the right to be an attorney based solely
on her sex. The United States Supreme Court held, "[T]he civil law,
as well as nature herself, has always recognized a wide difference
in the respective spheres and destinies of man and woman. Man is,
or should be, woman's protector and defender. The natural and proper
timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently
unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life. The paramount
destiny and mission of woman are to fulfill the noble and benign
offices of wife and mother. This is the law of the Creator."
The Gay and Lesbian community has supported
a legal defense and education fund, Lambda, for over 25 years. We
need to work toward change in the leather community as well. The
NLA has a project and I will be working with the Leather Leadership
Conference next year on this area as well. You can help by sending
me information on leather legal issues in your area.
SEND INQUIRIES AND INFORMATION ABOUT LEGAL ISSUES TO rumpoule@aol.com.
Special credit and thanks to RUMPOULE for compiling this information!
|